Queen's House review
Queen's House is one of those buildings that gets eulogised in all the guidebooks, but when you actually come and see it you'll think... huh, okay. Is that it?. If you weren't told it was famous beforehand then you wouldn't have a clue it was.
Can you see the Old Royal Naval College on the other side of the road? That's where the Tudor Palace used to be. Whenever you read about Henry VIII and Elizabeth I staying at Greenwich Palace then that's where it was. James I added Queen's House in 1616 but when the English Civil War kicked off in 1642 the king and court were forced to flee from London and Greenwich Palace fell into disrepair. That spelled the beginning of the end for the building, and when the monarchy was restored in the 1660s it was decided to knock it down and replace it with Christopher Wren's Royal Hospital instead (now called the Old Royal Naval College).
It's always been a puzzler to me why they chose to knock down the palace and not the house, but it seems that Tudor palaces were ten-a-penny in those days -- London still had Whitehall Palace, St. James's Palace, Nonsuch Palace and Hampton Court still standing, plus the recently demolished Richmond Palace. Queen's House, however, was regarded as a true original. When Inigo Jones was commissioned to build it he had just come back from his grand Italian tour and poured everything he saw into this -- the first truly classical building in Britain. It's hard to imagine what people thought of it in the 1630s -- it must have been like Elvis doing Heartbreak Hotel. To us it just looks rather plain.
The King's bedchamber, presence chamber, closet and other Royal rooms are all long gone -- they've been stripped out and turned into galleries for the National Maritime Museum's art collection. They're mostly naval-related, so you've got seascapes, sea battles, and portraits of old captains and admirals.
The Queen's bedchamber is much more opulent and still has its red and pink painted ceiling, and instead of naval paintings you get scenes of Whitehall and Westminster instead (definitely worth a look). Her Privy Chamber has some very famous paintings of the Tudors and Stuarts -- everyone from Henry VIII and Elizabeth I to Francis Drake.
What do you think?Please leave a comment
Have you seen my London book?
Honest reviews of London’s landmarks and attractions
Money saving tips things to do for free and cheap days out
Useful information with opening times, prices, photos, maps
Read my review:
London Film Museum
They need to rename the London Film Museum because the only film it covers is James Bond. The first time I came here I t… more
Read my review:
House of Lords -- Public Gallery
Given a choice between visiting the House of Commons and the House of Lords I'll always choose the Lords, because the de… more
Wed 19th Jul, 2017It's a beautiful building to visit and well worth seeing inside, but I agree that the court cases themselves can be... more
Sat 15th Jul, 2017I can not think about your review, I am still laughing ... thanks. I plan to visit the Jewel Tower in August. The... more
Mon 10th Jul, 2017it's funny that you posted your comment today because I've just been thinking about going again (it's... more
Tue 27th Jun, 2017Not sure I can really help with a visa mate, but I hope you enjoy your visit
Tue 20th Jun, 2017I'm in the Top 10 fruitcakes, definitely... maybe the Top 5 on a good day
Tue 30th May, 2017Cheers bob, handy piece of info